Showing posts with label Anilao Technical Diving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anilao Technical Diving. Show all posts

Saturday, 5 December 2015

November 2015 – Post Dengue Hammerhead and Tech Courses

Finally getting back in the water after getting over coming down with Dengue really hammered home just how much you miss diving when you can’t get wet!

Given the rearrangement of courses over October ,November ended up as a busy month with multiple tech courses, including finishing the TDI Advanced Nitrox and Decompression Procedures courses with Asanga and Nick.





A good friend and diver from back in the MDA days, Brittin, returned to the Philippines for a week in November to complete his Hammerhead CCR factory training and TDI Air Diluent Decompression Procedures course.  Brittin had been out of the water for quite a while and had no other experience with Rebreather but took to the unit like a natural, flying the unit fully manually in perfect trim within the first few days!









Finally we ended up November (well, actually it was in December but only just!) with a trip to Verde Island from Anilao Beach Club.  The day trip is quite easy from Anilao and can be done with a 1.5 hour transfer on a large banka capable of holding up to 20 divers.  For divers based in Manila it’s often through the Verde Island trip needs to be done from PG, what many divers based in Manila don’t realize is that is actually possible to do the same trip cheaper and with less transport headaches from Anilao than it is from PG – we’re hoping to do a lot more of these trips in the coming months as, quite simply, Verde Diving is awesome.

Tuesday, 18 August 2015

O2 Cell Lifetimes and the Importance of In-Dive Validation Checks

The importance of both regularly changing O2 cells and carrying out in-dive validation was evident made on a recent mixed gas dive in Anilao.  The dive in question was done using a JJ-CCR with 3 cells that were just over 16 months old – normally I’d only use cells under, or very close to, 12 months – however due to a ‘technical issue’ (aka forgetting to bring the counterlungs for my HH unit!) I chose to use the available JJ over the other option of a 6 hour round trip to Manila to pick-up the HH counterlungs.  I should also point out here I am certified to use a JJ and it is a unit I’m familiar with :-)

The dives were originally scheduled for July with some our Trimix course graduates, however we were forced to reschedule when typhoon “Falcon” (International name “Chan-hom”) passed close to the East coast of the Philippines, bringing with it rough conditions to the West coast.  Even with the dive entry direct from shore we opted it was better to delay the dives to another time rather than push through with a long dive while the waves were getting bigger by the hour.

Picking the right conditions for the dives and finding a time in which we were all available (myself, a course director based out of Cebu and an instructor based out of Manila/Anilao) brought us to Friday 14th to Sunday 16th August to complete the dives and extend the Acacia deep line a little further.

All gases were already blended and ready from the previous planned dives in July and we had a perfect window with tides to complete the dives. Given the circumstances and the fact that I’d previously used cells up to 18 months on different units with no problems I felt the risks involved with using the older cells could be countered with the caveat that I’d perform regular validation and verification checks on the dive and bail-out if I did not feel comfortable with any results.


Having completed all pre-dive checks on the JJ all seemed fine, the unit was already reading 0.21/0.22/0.21 on all cells before calibration, during calibration the 3rd cell seems a little slow to react compared to cells 1 and 2, checking the mV reading it was showing just under 43mV for O2 which seemed a little low (the other 2 cells were reading around 49 and 48mV) – given the slow reaction I decided to recalibrate the unit and found the same results, all cells also returned down to linearity when exposed to air (0.22, 0.21 and 0.22 as I recall).  Another set of pre-checks followed and the unit seemed ready to dive.

The output from the primary handset is shown below:

During the first dive our planned depth was 110m, the aim being to confirm the line was still in place and ready the end spool for a extension down to 130-140m the following day.  With the lower mV reading on cell 3 I wanted to check linearity at a PPO2 of 1.4 and above so confirmed all 3 cells could reach 1.6 PPO2 at the start of the dive (line 0 on the shearwater output).  During the initial descent (between lines 0 and 1 on the shearwater output) I noticed the third cell was consistently a little lower than the other two, but just inside the 20% deviation needed to be voted out by the Shearwater electronics – I normally fly all rebreather in manual mode with the electronics set as a back-up at 0.7 or 1.0 PPO2 in most cases so this wasn’t of immediate concern, however I wanted to check it stabilised for decompression info during the dive.

The plan was to use scooters to make the initial swim easier (and quicker for the divers using OC) from shore to the steep drop-off (around 100m distance from shore), we dropped the scooters at the top of the steep drop off at a depth of 60m, this gave me a chance to validate the cell readings – adding O2 to spike the PPO2 to above 1.4 now resulted in the 3rd cell, previously showing the 20% lower PPO2, now jumping to a PPO2 of 1.7 while the other two cells showed 1.4 (line 1 on the Shearwater output) – I was worried at this point that it could be that the other two cells were faulty and the 3rd cell the most accurate, however adding diluent to bring the PPO2 back down showed the 1st and 2nd cells reacting much faster while the 3rd cell didn’t seem to change, responding very slowly and much less than would be expected for the amount of diluent added to the vented loop.  By this time I was almost certain the third cell was at fault and cells 1 and 2 were giving me correct reading, to confirm this I vented the loop and filled with diluent through the descent to 110m, checking the PPO2 did not fall below the diluent PPO2 for that depth (I was using a 9/65 diluent so checking the PPO2 didn’t fall below 0.1 x the pressure works as a quick check – the wonder of metric units!).

Through the descent cells 1 and 2 behaved as would be expected, but yet the 3rd cell continued to react slowly and tended to ‘stick then drop’ rather than a constant drop of PPO2 that occurred each time diluent was added on cells 1 and 2.  This well and truly confirmed the 3rd cell faulty, I just wanted to confirm the 1st and 2nd cells were working as planned.  To err on the side of caution I kept the 3rd cell reading below a PPO2 of 1.6 and let cells 1 and 2 drop to a PPO2 of 0.8/0.9 – the solenoid was set to fire were set to kick-in at a PPO2 0.7 and given the depth being over 100m at this point I wasn’t too worried about the lower PPO2 until the cells could be verified (my back up computer was set to a constant PPO2 of 1.0 until the ascent).  Once we had completed the adjustment of the spool and set-it up for the next dive I made a diluent flush on the ascent to check the cells responded, the PPO2on cells 1 and 2 rose slightly to just over 0.9 (very slightly lower than the actual diluent set-point at that average depth), while the 3rd cell showed the PPO2 increasing well above 1.6 when additional diluent was added.  I was now confident cells 1 and 2 were giving good information, and that cell 3 was giving completely wrong information – by this time the 3rd cell was voted out (as it had been since the 60m check on the descent) so the primary handset was controlling everything as planned.

The ascent continued as planned (with one delay at around 65m to adjust and re-secure the existing line placement), I wanted to keep an average PPO of 1.2 above 60m on the ascent so did this manually using the readings from cells 1 and 2.  The 3rd cell was still way above the readings on cell 1 and 2, until I carried out another cell check at 36m by adding O2 to spike the PPO2 above 1.4 (line 3 on the Shearwater output), at which point  cells 1 and 2 spiked as planned while the 3rd cell only increased slightly in PPO2 (bringing it back into 20% of the average and therefore no longer being voted out).  The next few deco stops then see the PPO2 of cell 3 drop slower than in cells 1 and 2, leading to cell 3 hovering just under 20% above the cell 1 and cell 2 reading – ie not voted out(between lines 3 and 4 on the Shearwater output).

To make sure the output of cells 1 and 2 wasn’t voltage limited I spiked the PPO2 back up to above 1.4 at 24m (line 4 on the Shearwater output) which brought all 3 cells close to 1.6 again, after this point the cell reading stayed quite close, until the cell 3 PPO2 suddenly dropped at around 73 minute of run time, I did another small PPO2 spike to check cells 1 and 2 weren’t frozen but found both responded as expected while cell 3 had almost frozen at a lower PPO2.  The lower starting mV reading for cell 3 meant that once again it was just hanging in there at 0.25 below the other cells and was not voted out again until around 10 minutes later when it dropped more than 20% outside the cell 1 and 2 readings.

By the end of the 6m stops on both computers I now had two quite different decompression profiles, my primary handset was showing over 40 minutes (I think it was 43) at 3m while the back-up (also a petrel but set to a fixed PPO2 of 1.0 initially then 1.2 after 60m on the ascent) was showing just 23 minutes. Given the problems with cell 3 and the fact the cells were older I thought it was best to finish off the dive on OC O2 which also brought down the total time needed at the final 3m stop (I switched to OC bail-out on 100% O2 a line 7 of the Shearwater output, the majority of the OC stop was then done at 4.5m as you can see).  After switching to OC I vented the loop via the counterlung OPV dump (line 8 on the Shearwater output), the JJ ADV is very sensitive and a little diluent entered the loop as I was venting - as soon as this happened I noticed that the reading for cell 3 increased suddenly while cells 1 and 2 dropped as expected.  Even during the OC part of the dive you can still see that the 3rd cell reading jumps around a lot.

We finished the dive by clearing both computers on OC bail-out (both were petrel controllers dived at GF 25/85), I was just a little surprised how much impact the faulty 3rd cell appeared to have on the decompression times – this seems to be an ‘unlucky’ profile as the 3rd cell seemed to have a funny habit of landing about 19.5% away from the other cells so didn’t quite get voted out.

Obviously there is a very high chance that all of this could probably have been avoided by having fresh cells after 12 months, however the way the cell behaved was something I had not seen before while ‘standard’ pre-dive checks and a validation PPO2 of 1.6 at 6m at the end of the dive wouldn’t have shown anything out of the ordinary.  The fact the cell behaved normally, then gave an artificially high reading at depth and an artificially low reading at mid-range before returning to near alignment in the shallows and finishing off with any slight change in PPO2 (increase or decrease) being exaggerated was a new one for me.

In summary two lessons learned, don't use cells past the recommended 12 months and secondly never under estimate the importance of in-dive cell validation through out the dive - hitting 1.6 at 6m does not validate the whole dive!

Monday, 6 July 2015

June 2015 - Wet season arrives... But there's still some Awesome Diving

JM and Alex Post-Dive Planning
The slightly later than normal start to the wet season finally arrived this month with conditions a bit rougher than the near perfect conditions we've had since October.  that said, we still had plenty of time for some awesome diving.

This month saw JM return from Cebu to complete his full DSAT TecTrimix course with Alex from MDA in Manila.   Both of these guys are highly experienced divers (Course Directors and Instructors in fact!) which made this course an absolute please to teach. 

Sadly our final post-course dive didn't happen as the outskirts of Tropical Storm Egay led to some rough seas and we all decided it was best to save the now blended gases for another day to make the dive in better conditions.  were looking forward to seeing JM again soon in the near future so we can team up again with Alex and made a slightly delayed post-course dive past the 100m mark.



Alex getting to grips with multiple bottles underwater...

...and on the surface





"Terrible" Weather
The weather for the rest of the month was great for half the month, not so great for the remainder of the month.  The peninsular geography of Anilao between two large bays means that even on rough days one side of the peninsular is normally pool like conditions. 

The secret Bay site to the East of the Anilao Peninsular is best know for the many macro critters and muck diving - but it also make a great spot for skills training and videos - we made the most of a few rough days by completing some additional skills videos for the Hammerhead CCR series we have on our YouTube channel, as well as some Open Circuit skills you'll see go on there soon.



Check out some of the sample skills in the links below:


Bail-Out to Open Circuit:




High PPO2 Procedure:




1 Cell Voted Out Procedure:


Wednesday, 27 May 2015

May 2015 - DSAT Courses and Trips!

May is normally the last month of peak season here in the Philippines and we thought we'd make the most of this with trips to both Coron Bay and Verde Island.

Our Coron trip was our first trip back to the Coron Wrecks for almost a year so it was great to get back, catch-up with people and dive again in the best wreck diving location in the Philippines.  We even had time to pull together a few video clips from this trip; the YouTube links below should give you an idea of what to expect - we'll be planning regular trips there every 3-4 months.

Coron, Irako Maru Wreck - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dREXbn6E4U
Coron, Kyokuzan Maru Wreck - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGQVO23rl9o

Making the most of the near perfect weather we also arranged a trip over to Verde Island from Anilao.  This trip went really well and is something we'll be doing a lot more of in the near future.  The boat ride from Anilao is around 90 minutes, so is longer than the PG trip but the large (PG ferry) sized boat we used made it a really comfortable trip.  The trip was done over a full moon weekend so some crazy currents were around, especially at the Washing Machine site when the tide was on a strong ebb.

We'd also like to pass on our congratulations to Cesar who this month completed his Tec45 course after a few weeks of diving with us.

The weather here is holding up well with conditions still hot and sunny and no rain it sight (yet!) so we're looking forward to more great dives in June with CCR, Technical and Instructor courses lined up here in the Philippines.








Tuesday, 24 March 2015

March 2015 - TDI and DSAT Technical Courses

In March we held technical courses under both TDI and PADI, with Marie and Pavel finishing off their Advanced Nitrox and Decompression Procedures courses and Cesar continuing on his Tec45 programme.

The ideal technical dive team size is the group of three so having three divers at similar course levels in the water is a please to teach in terms of team awareness and communication, as well as watching how individuals respond to a different team dynamic.

With everyone using the same Shearwater Petrel computers it was also good to be able to spend the last dive focusing on decompression diving using a computer and the importance of gas planning before the dive and monitoring the required deco gas reserves during the bottom phase of the dive.

Pavel also got to try out his new custom made to measure Santi eMotion drysuit which fit like a dream and came in very useful with the water temperatures still hovering at around 24C.

Congratulations to Marie and Pavel on completing their TDI Decompression Procedures and Advanced Nitrox courses and looking forward to their TDI Extended Range course next month.  We'r also looking forward to seeing Cesar again in April for the final part of his DSAT TecRec Tec45 course.




Saturday, 28 February 2015

February 2015 - Cesar Tec 45 Course

February saw a former recreational student, Cesar Teng, return for his Technical training.  Cesar had previously completed the DSAT TecRec Tec40 course in Puerto Galera and 3 of the 4 Tec45 dives in Moalboal; both of these previous course were completed in Sidemount - as Cesar wanted to also complete Tec50 we decided it was best to switch to the more suitable back mounted twin tank configuration in preparation for two deco gas dives.

Being new to Twin Tank diving is someone most of us don't remember fondly, we spent a few days covering the core skills and standard procedures we use for planning dives.  Despite a niggling back pain Cesar's enthusiasm for learning is just as strong in technical diving as it was in recreational diving and it's great to work with him again.

We're looking forward to having Cesar back shortly to close out his Tec45 course and move onto the Tec50 course.





Saturday, 31 January 2015

January 2015 - Piotr TDI Extended Range Class

To start off the year we welcomes returning technical Diver Piotr Sliwakowski who completed his TDI Extended Range course having previously completed entry level technical courses with us in 2014 while based in the Philippines.  Piotr was visiting from Europe on this occasion and took the opportunity to further his technical diving knowledge.

The water in Anilao can be cold in January/February but this year has been particularly cold with water temperatures at 23C and below 20C at 50m!  Having made quite a few dives in twin tanks with stage bottles while in the Philippines, Piotr had no worries in closing out the course and completing his training.

Congratulations to Piotr and hope to see you back on your next visit for some Trimix diving!




Monday, 14 July 2014

Deco on the Fly and Gas Planning



Deco on the Fly and Gas Planning

Following on from the short article we made on recreational gas planning it seemed a god idea to follow up with some guidelines on gas planning at the next level – entry level technical diving.

For most technical divers, dives down to 50m are often done on the fly.  We still normally start with a plan, but often something comes up or we can often end up staying longer than the plan or going a little deeper.

Modern technical computers make deco on the fly viable
Carrying out deco on the fly is often seen as a risky approach to technical diving, although this isn’t always the case with the correct planning and knowledge.  Most technical divers have spent $1,000 or more on a technical dive computer (often more than one!) so already have the decompression information at hand for a revised profile – the risky part is ensuring we have enough gas to complete the dive, and that's what we’ll cover here.

Basically what we are going to do is work out how long a deco bottle will last, we can then use this to estimate how much decompression (or time to surface on most computers) we can accumulate without running the risk of being out of gas during the deco.

The basis of these calculations are similar to the recreational article from a few weeks back (this link takes you there - http://www.maniladiveacademy.blogspot.com/2014/07/one-thing-we-try-to-emphasize-in-our.html).  We’ll assume a conservative breathing rate of 20 litres per minute at the surface to estimate deco bottle durations.

EAN50 Gas Planning

EAN50 is generally the most versatile deco gas
The most common decompression gas is the trusty 12l EAN50 bottle, this is normally breathed at 21m and shallower and is often combined with O2 for longer or multiple dives.  Like most decompression profiles the stops are generally longer as the stops become shallower, almost resembling a Fibonacci series pattern (i.e. 1-1-2-3-5-8-13-21 etc…) in many cases.

If we use a conservative average depth of 15m for EAN50 (it would normally be shallower) this would give an adjusted breathing rate of 2.5ata x 20l/min = 50 litres per minute.  A typical 12l tank at 200 bar will hold 2,200+ bar of gas – 2,200 litres / 50 l/min gives 44 minutes of gas – we’ll say 40 minutes to be conservative.

We can now use the 40 minute bottle as a benchmark – basically for every 10 bar we have 2 minutes of decompression gas in a 12l tank, or 1 minute per 10 bar in a 6l tank.  Using this logic a tank with 130 bar would have 26 minutes of decompression gas, or a 6 litre tank at 160 bar would have 16 minutes of decompression gas.

Factoring in Oxygen to Gas Planning

When using a second decompression gas as oxygen we can also factor this in.  In most case, the decompression time between 21m to the surface is split evenly between EAN50 depths and O2 depths; that is we’ll spend 50% of the time at 21m to 9m and the other 50% between 6m and the surface.  This has one obvious advantage, it effectively doubles the amount EAN50 deco gas we need, IF (and this is an important if) the O2 gas volumes are also planned!

Assuming the average O2 depth is 5m or 1.5 ata, our adjusted breathing rate would be 1.5 ata x 20l/min = 30 litres per minute.  Using a 12l bottle at 200 bar as the benchmark we can say this bottle has 2,200 litres / 30 l/min = 73 min, say 70 minutes of deco gas use.

Using the same numbers as above this corresponds to every 10 bar in a 12l cylinder representing 3.5 minutes of deco gas, we like to make sure we have some O2 left over for any post dive emergencies or just for in water contingencies so lets use 3 minutes per 10 bar as our benchmark, of 1.5 in a 6l bottle.  So, a 12l at 80 bar would be 24 minutes of O2 deco gas while a 6l bottle at 120 bar would be 18 minutes of O2 deco gas.

Back Gas Planning and Reserves

Maintaining sufficient back gas is critical
The key concept in this scenario is that in a worst-case(gas sharing at minimum reserve) situation we are prepared to skip any deco below 21m and ascend from depth directly to the gas switch depth.  Unless the dive is excessively long, or part of a multiple long dive series, it is unlikely we’d have any significant decompression obligation below 21m for dives up to 50m in depth.  This principle also requires EAN50 to be available at 21m, dives using only O2 as a decompression gas aren’t suitable for this method of gas planning and are not suggested as a result – make a plan and stick to it for these dives!

If we assume our ascent is at a maximum rate of 10m/min and we allow an additional 1 minute at the bottom to signal the team and start the ascent, plus 2 minutes at 21m to change gas as a team we get the following gas consumptions:


30m Depth
35m Depth
40m Depth
45m Depth
50m Depth
Max Depth Pressure
4.0 ATA
4.5 ATA
5.0 ATA
5.5 ATA
6.0 ATA
Average Ascent Depth
25.5m
28.0m
30.5m
33.0m
35.5m
Average Ascent Pressure
3.6 ATA
3.8 ATA
4.1 ATA
4.3 ATA
4.6 ATA
Ascent Time
1.0 min
1.5 min
2.0 min
2.5 min
3.0 min
Gas Use at Bottom
80 litres
90 litres
100 litres
110 litres
120 litres
Ascent Gas Use
71 litres
114 litres
162 litres
215 litres
273 litres
Switch Gas Use
124 litres
124 litres
124 litres
124 litres
124 litres
Total Gas Use
275 litres
328 litres
386 litres
449 litres
517 litres






Assuming 11.3l twin tanks
12.2 Bar
14.5 Bar
17.1 Bar
19.9 Bar
22.9 Bar

You’ll notice the gas pressure required in twin tanks is just under half the depth in metres of the pressures above; if we allow for two divers both breathing at an increased rate of 30 l/min our gas consumption rates increase by a factor of 3 (20 l/min to 60 l/min) – so the half the depth becomes 0.5 x 3 = 1.5 times the depth in m.

Our benchmark then becomes 1.5 times the depth in metres assuming we are going to switch to EAN50 at 21m, we then complete the deco on EAN50 alone or a combination of EAN50 and O2.

Putting it all together

So, how do we use this?  Lets say we’ll do a dive to 50m and will be using EAN50 (in a 12l tank at 130 bar) and O2 (in a 6l tank at 110 bar) – how do we plan our gasses to suit the deco?

Bring a little too much gas for the dive is not a bad thing
The first factor is the back gas, we need 1.5 times the depth as a reserve to bring two of us up to the 21m gas switch – 50m x 1.5 = 75 Bar in this case.

Now the deco, we have 130 bar of EAN50 at 2 minutes per 10 bar, so 26 minutes of EAN50 gas.  The O2 tank is a smaller 6l bottle at 110 bar, at 1.5 minutes per bar that's just over 16 minutes of O2 deco.

So, if we keep 75 Bar of back gas at 50m we can run up a total deco time of 26 minutes if we use EAN50 alone, or 32 minutes if we use both EAN50 and O2 (16 minutes on EAN50 and 16 minutes on O2).

Things to consider

These numbers are conservative but give some flexibility in deco on the fly as having a little too much gas for a dive is rarely a problem; these figures give ball park estimates and should be used in place of proper gas planning.  We’d normally suggest factoring in maximum deco times of gas into the equipment check at the start of the dive; for example “I am carrying two decompression gasses, EAN50 and O2, my EAN50 is in a 12l bottle with 160 bar of pressure giving me a maximum of 32 minutes of decompression gas, my O2 is also in a 12l bottle at 90 bar of pressure giving me 27 minutes of decompression gas.  Using both gases I have enough decompression gas to complete 54 minutes of total decompression”.

A key consideration if using a computer to provide total deco time of time to surface (TTS) values is what this TTS time is based on, many computers use all gasses in memory to estimate this time – it’s important the gasses are switched on or off correctly when using this type of gas planning – for example if I am diving with 40 minutes of EAN50 and 10 minutes of O2 I need to consider I may not have enough O2 to complete the required deco if my deco is longer than 20 minutes – it’s best to switch off the O2 in the computer and use the TTS based on EAN50 alone – the O2 can always be switched back on the ascent portion of the dive or after the switch to EAN50 occurs.

Ratio decompression is also another method of providing decompression information on the fly, however we don’t suggest this should be used as a primary method of decompression as the availability of more accurate technical computers at a relatively low price and excessive times normally given for ratio decompression for dives in the 40-50m range make this technique less than ideal.  Ratio decompression does however make an excellent back-up tool.

Key Rules

There are basically three numbers to remember for this method of gas planning, as follows:

                - EAN50 gives 2 minutes of gas per 10 bar in a 12l bottle

                - O2 gives 3 minutes of gas per 10 bar in a 12l bottle

                - Back Gas reserves in bar should be 1.5 times the depth in metres when using 12l twins

A predive review of all gases carried is recommended
Try using these rules at the start of each dive as a double check on how much deco gas is available to each diver, it’s a good practice to get into regardless of whether deco on the fly will be performed or not.